Currently hosted by the School of PhilosophyThis is the first newsletter since our successful Brisbane Conference two months ago. Essentially, it is divided into two parts: News and Views. In the news section you will find various items of interest, both about the Association and in the larger world of applied ethics. In the views section you will find ideas from members about the directions that the association ought to be taking; and also discussions of current issues in applied ethics. To kick this off, I have included a brief discussion on the ethics of peacekeeping, to which your responses for the next newsletter are welcome.
Your contributions are needed. If there is any item that should be in the "News" section - for example, an upcoming conference or regional meeting - please let me know, including all relevant details. Likewise, if you have an issue that you want to raise in "Views" - be it about the association, or to raise an issue in applied ethics for further discussion - please contact me. For example, there may be an interesting case study that you think merits further discussion.
I look forward to receiving your feedback about this newsletter, and to receiving your contributions for the next newsletter.
Keith Joseph
Conference Proceedings are being edited by Noel Preston and Seumas Miller, and should be ready early in the new year. To obtain your copy, forward your address and a cheque for ten dollars (payable to the AAPAE) to the Association.
More details will be sent to you early in the new year.
The incoming committee would like to express its thanks to the outgoing committee, and especially to Simon Longstaff, for his hard work as the foundation president of the Association. We look forward to Simon's continuing contribution to the Association in the future. Our thanks also go to Michael Walsh, Lynn Gillam, Peter Jubb, and Anne Stonehouse for their contribution to the Association in its formative period.
Australian Association for Professional and Applied EthicsAll inquiries, and membership application and renewals should be sent to that address.
PO Box A2526
Sydney South NSW 2000
Business Ethics Michael Schwartz
Ethics and Schooling Noel Preston
Institutional Ethics Committees Anne McMahon
Computing Ethics Paula Roberts
The contact details for the above convenors can be found on page 6 (details of committee members). Please contact them directly if you want to participate in that group's activities.
If you are interested in an area not mentioned, please contact the Secretary. This invitation is especially extended to any member who wants to be the convenor of such a group.
http://www.uq.oz.au/philosophy/index.html
If these details are incorrect or have been changed; or if you would like additional information included (for example, work, mobile, or home telephone number); or if you do not want to be included on the list, or would prefer some of the information not to be included (such as home phone number), please let the Association Secretary know.
Also, please let the Secretary know if your postal address is incorrect.
The information is arranged across the page as follows:
AC Aust Capital Territory
QC Qld - Central (eg Rockhampton)
NE NSW - Newcastle
QN Qld - North
NN NSW - North (eg Lismore)
QS Qld - South (eg Brisbane, Toowoomba)
NP NSW - Provincial
SA South Australia
NS NSW - Sydney
VM Vic - Melbourne
NT Northern Territory
VP Vic - Provincial
NZ New Zealand
WA Western Australia
This last item is included to facilitate in the co-ordination of regional meetings.
Howard Whitton
Principal Adviser, Ethics Public Sector Management Committee
PO Box 190
Brisbane (Albert St) Qld 4179ph: (07) 3224 6663 fax: (07) 3224 6549
e-mail: howard.whitton@qldgov.telememo.au
Further information from Louise Armstrong-Quincey, (08) 302 3956, fax (08) 302 3997
Further information from Brian Schrag, Executive Secretary
Fax: 0015-1-812 855 3315,
e-mail: appe@indiana.edu
More details in next issue.
It is therefore very pleasing to attend various functions organised by the Association and participate in animated discussions between people who would rarely, if ever, find themselves together ...
Special thanks are due to the Brisbane committee ... convened by Dr Noel Preston. The support of St. John's College in this regard has been excellent - in particular the Reverend Dr John Morgan, Warden of St John's, and his colleagues; the late Reverend Ron Marks and Ms Jane Oliver are owed special appreciation for their work in organising the conference ...
Some commentators have treated the rise of interest in applied ethics with cynicism. For example, it is not uncommon to hear it suggested that philosophers have only deigned to embrace applied ethics as a strategy which will satisfy a contemporary demand for 'relevance'. Of course, the same claim is made about similar developments in the so-called 'soft' disciplines of the humanities.
It may be that some of the current interest in ethics can be accounted for by the motive of institutional and professional survival. However, even if this were the original spring to action, I believe that most of those involved have discovered something quite compelling about the debates into which they enter. Speaking personally, I consider it to be a sort of 'home-coming' for philosophers as we once again take seriously the practical concerns of our fellow citizens. I never forget that Socrates operated in the market-place and not the academy. And in this respect, I feel that philosophers have a lot to learn from others who have an unbroken tradition of dealing with the practical. Hence, my sense of the importance of the Association as a meeting point.
Of the lessons that might be learned I wish to suggest that perhaps the most important is the need for humility. It is immensely tempting to fall into the trap of being an acknowledged 'expert'. It is a venial sin when the consequences of adopting such a persona are nothing more than stimulating heated academic debate. However, there are far graver consequences when the putative expert begins to deal in the world of everyday experience.
In these circumstances, one encounters people who may be deeply affected by what is said and the manner of its saying. It is not for me to declare how such matters should be approached. After all, I am no expert. However, I do reserve the right to draw attention to the need for all of us to think through the implications of our engagement in the field of applied and professional ethics. Thus, in concluding, I would hope that the Association might explore the ethical dimension of its own activities - perhaps considering ways in which it can draw on the traditions of its members; and especially those supportive of a culture of care.
Peacekeeping presents a different set of problems for the military to that which they are traditionally faced with. The intention is to prevent bloodshed, and the interests being furthered are likely to be those of the communities in which the peacekeepers are stationed, rather than those of the nation sending the military force. An additional problem is the unwillingness of some of those for whom the peace is being kept to accept the presence of the peacekeepers: this means that the military force, instead of facing a conventional military opponent will face either guerilla resistance or civilian non-cooperation. In an extreme case two or more of the parties in conflict may not really desire peace, and will attempt to continue the conflict with each other.
With this different emphasis comes different ethical problems. Two examples might help illuminate some of the ethical problems involved in peace keeping. The first represents the strong option to peacekeeping: that is, the use of overwhelming force to suppress violence. The second represents the "softly, softly" option, where there is not sufficient force to suppress violence: the presence of peacekeepers is to provide humanitarian aid or to act as observers.
A team of Australian medics, accompanied by a small guard of 20 infantry soldiers, were present at a refugee camp in the south of Rwanda when the victorious forces of the new Rwandan government decided to disband the camp and send the refugees home. This had occurred before at various camps, with relatively little blood shed. However, in this case there was a massacre, over a period of several hours, in which up to 4,000 refugees were killed by two battalions of government troops. What were the ADF troops to do? Legally they were entitled to intervene, with force, to end the massacre. However, there is little doubt that had they done so they would have been overwhelmed by the far greater fire power of the government troops; who probably would have then resumed the massacre with even greater vigour. So, the ADF troops stood on the sidelines, watching the massacre, occasionally venturing forth with great courage to treat the wounded. This is not meant as a criticism of the ADF troops: they took what was the only reasonable and moral course. The problem is that of humanitarian missions in general - do they end up only prolonging the agony and warfare, by providing an infrastructure of medical care, physical nurturing and rest which allows the madness to continue? Do they make things better or worse?
On the other hand, there is a strong human urge to do something: it is simply wrong to watch individuals die and suffer if it is in your power to intervene. Very often the only thing that can be done is use the military in a peacekeeping role.
If you provide overwhelming force - as Australia did in Baidoa - how long are you willing to keep that force there to secure the peace? And if you use insufficient force to keep the peace - for example in a humanitarian mission - are you merely prolonging the agony of war? Another ethical problem is the duty that a nation owes to its armed forces: it should not unnecessarily endanger the safety of its troops. Peacekeeping is a risky occupation: the welfare of the peacekeepers needs to be considered, as well as the welfare of those whom they are protecting.
So, to conclude: is peacekeeping moral? It responds to a deep moral urge to help others; but arguably it often fails to do so. Finally, is it ethical to keep the peace where those for whom you are keeping the peace don't seem to want it kept?
Vice-President
Prof Tony Coady
Department of Philosophy
University of Melbourne
Parkville Vic 3052
(w) (03) 9344 5155
fax: (03) 9344 4280
Treasurer
Dr William Grey
Department of Philosophy
University of Queensland
Brisbane Qld 4072
(w) (07) 3365 2099
(h) (07) 3378 8670
fax: (07) 3365 1968
wgrey@lingua.cltr.uq.oz.au
Secretary
Mr Keith Joseph
John Plunkett Centre for Ethics in Health Care
St. Vincent's Hospital
Darlinghurst NSW 2010
(w) (02) 361 2869
(h) (049) 26 1949
fax: (02) 361 0975
plkrj@cc.newcastle.edu.au
Conference Convenor
Prof Seumas Miller
School of Humanities and Social Sciences
Charles Sturt University
Locked Bag 678
Wagga Wagga NSW 2678
(w) (069) 33 2471
fax: (069) 33 2792
smiller@csu.edu.au
Committee Members
Ms Meg Herbert
Dean of Students
Uniting Church Centre for Ministry
16 Masons Drive
North Parramatta NSW 2151
(02) 683 3655
fax: (02) 415 1464
cmostert@extro.ucc.su.oz.au
Ms Anne McMahon
Faculty of Applied Science
University of Canberra
PO Box 1
Belconnen ACT 2616
(w) (06) 201 2719
fax: (06) 201 5402
mcmahon@science.canberra.edu.au
Mrs Paula Roberts
38 Cowan Street
Gawler SA 5118
(h) (085) 22 5347
fax: (08) 302 5101
Mr Michael Schwartz
Faculty of Business
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
(w) (03) 9660 5512
This page is being maintained by Bill Tarrant:
b.tarrant@unsw.edu.au
21 October, 1997
Back to AAPAE Home Page
UNSW School of Philosophy Page